Skip to main content Accessibility Statement

The Student Strategic Advisory Committee (SSAC) is essential to QAA, providing invaluable advice and guidance based on the unique perspectives and expertise of its members, comprising students, student representatives, and staff from students’ unions or representative bodies in UK higher education.

 

QAA is dedicated to actively engaging students in its work. For the 2025-26 term, QAA aims to strategically use the expertise of SSAC members to set priorities for student engagement across the Agency.

 

Photo of the Student Strategic Advisory Committee

Join the Committee

We are recruiting for up to 11 new members to join us for the 2026-27 recruitment for our QAA Student Strategic Advisory Committee (SSAC).


  • Do you have a passion for sharing the student perspective on the quality of the student experience?
  • Are you keen to become an active participant of a strategic committee for a UK-wide, world-renowned sector body?

For further information about the role please take a look at our recruitment pack. To express your interest in becoming a member please complete this short form (we do not accept CVs). The recruitment period will run between 09:00 on 5 June until 23:45 on 3 July. The terms of reference for the committee are available further down the page.

 

For anyone considering getting involved, I say, definitely do so. You'll meet the greatest bunch of people. You'll get the absolute best support from the staff team to encourage you in engaging with work that drives you to want more from HE for all of us. Just watching the way that everyone here works to enable us to build something great, and to feed into sector wide discussions, in a way that makes you feel like you are doing something awesome. I want every student to feel that level of support and trust in their thoughts and ideas. I know I'm a much better person for spending these two years with SSAC.

Cinnomen McGuigan, The Open University, SSAC member 2024-26 


How SSAC operates

Members of SSAC have various opportunities to get involved in QAA work, such as participating in groups focusing on key areas such as Generative AI, speaking at events, and leading discussions within QAA networks. The committee has significantly influenced national student-centred projects, introduced student reviewers to QAA review teams, and shaped QAA’s overall strategy and the development of the UK Quality Code.

 

The SSAC begins each year with an in-person induction. This event sets the priorities for the year, introduces members to QAA, and fosters networking opportunities. Throughout the year, the committee meets at least three times. These meetings are attended by QAA’s Chief Executive, Chair of the Board, and other Board members. During these sessions, the Chief Executive and Chair present reports on activity at QAA and board meetings, discussions are held on key topics and progress on priority areas. Members also provide feedback on the development of high-profile sector projects and guidance, along with developments in the higher education sector.

 

A valuable opportunity to collaborate with others, develop a deeper understanding of inclusive communication, and contribute to guidance that has real impact across higher education. I would definitely recommend getting involved, as it is a meaningful experience that helps you develop new skills while being part of work that is genuinely shaped by student voice.
Dr Anastasia Kennett, PhD Student and Associate Lecturer in Equity, Diversity and Inclusion, University of Worcester, SSAC member 2024-26


View the outputs and resources for each of the priorities below:

 



View the outputs and resources for each of the priorities below:

 

 

In the aftermath of the cost-of-living crisis, and with increasing concerns about the marketisation of the HE sector, students are increasingly reporting value for money as key in choosing an institution and programme of study. As SSAC, we want to discuss and then feed into QAA Board discussions about what value for money means in the context of quality assurance with the aim of influencing the agency’s thinking and work in this space.



 

In response to sector trends (especially related to lower NSS results across HEIs in this category), as a committee we’re interested in discussing several things: first, how students are assessed on their understanding of their subject; second, how assessment is diversified to address different students' needs and preferences; third, what feedback should be to really help students improve. The outcomes of the discussions will then be fed back to the agency to shape sector best practice in this area.


Resources

 

Following discussion of this broad topic, student committee members identified a selection of practical resources they found particularly useful when advising peers on assessment and feedback.

 

Overarching sector guidance on assessment and feedback

Provider-specific guidance was highlighted as offering particular value for both students and advisers

 

As a committee, we would like to prioritise and promote the importance of accessible language used by institutions particularly around academic rules and regulations through our engagement with QAA and its Board. It is commonly reported by students that the language used by their institution is not easily understood. This, in turn, has consequences:
  • jargon and complex terms pose a barrier to effective communication to students; 
  • students might be less likely to follow and understand guidance; 
  • this might cause students to abstain from seeking support from their institution; 
  • where guidance is unclear/hard to understand, this could have repercussions on the successful outcome of study (guidance around the use of AI is a current example of this).

The main goal of this priority area is to raise awareness of the accessibility of language and impact on the learning and wider experiences for students and learners across the UK tertiary education sector.

 

To achieve this, we gathered and collated student and student representative feedback via a Padlet and drew upon our own experiences of navigating the often-complex language used across tertiary education.

 

In this document we present our initial findings along with recommendations for providers driven by the student perspective. All voices presented here are authentic and we have only amended quotes where spelling or grammatical corrections needed to be made or if we have picked out a key element in the quotes. 


Our committee

We are delighted to introduce the committee for 2025-26.

 

Co-chair

Jimena Alamo

Master's Student
University College London

Co-chair

Alex Stanley

Vice President Higher Education
National Union of Students

B.B.M Gajjar

Stakeholder
University College London

Shani Louison-Thomas

Student
Wrexham University

Shirley Tian

Student
The University of Edinburgh

Hannah Walton

Student
The University of Manchester