Home
Q190/95
Quality Assessment Report by the HEFCE for
University of Greenwich
Environmental Studies
December 1994
-
Contents
-
Introduction
-
Aims and Objectives
-
Student Learning
Experience
-
Student Achievement
-
Conclusions and
Recommendations
-
Introduction
-
This Report presents the findings of an assessment in
December 1994 of the quality of education provided in
environmental studies by the University of Greenwich.
-
The University of Greenwich has its origins in the former
Woolwich Polytechnic, founded in 1890 and the second oldest
polytechnic in the UK. It offered its first degree-level
courses in 1907, and in 1935 introduced the first sandwich
courses available in Britain. Considerable growth has
resulted from amalgamations with other colleges. In 1970
the Institution became Thames Polytechnic, and in 1992 the
University of Greenwich. There are several campuses in
south London and in north and west Kent.
-
The University is organised into 17 schools, grouped under
seven faculties, but there are plans to modify this
structure. The Head of School provides academic leadership
and administrative and financial management; budgets are
devolved directly to schools. There are nearly 17,500
students, around 650 full-time teaching and research staff,
and 430 part-time teaching staff. The University operates a
two-semester academic year and teaching is based on a unit
structure.
-
The School of Environmental Sciences was established four
years ago and is one of three schools within the Faculty of
Science; it is the sole occupant of the Rachel McMillan
campus in Deptford. The School is organised into two
subject groups - environmental studies and environmental
and occupational health. There are 547 full-time equivalent
(FTE) students in the School, of which 249 FTEs are in the
environmental studies subject area.
-
The assessment focused on the quality of provision in the
BSc Environmental Sciences, a degree course which has run
for several years and which developed from an earlier
diploma course. The programme is a three-year full-time
course; a four-year sandwich mode was introduced in 1993,
but few students have followed this route. A physical
science based BSc Environmental Control is currently being
phased out, with a newly re-validated scheme being launched
in October 1994; this shares a common first year with the
BSc Environmental Sciences, but the second and third years
will be based on different units. The School provides an
access course as an entry to its environmental degrees, and
the first year (Stage 0) of a four-year extended degree
provision may be taken at West Kent College, to be followed
by three years in the School.
Aims and Objectives
-
The University's mission includes the provision of
high-quality teaching, scholarship and research, the
encouragement of access, and the provision of flexible
pathways leading to employment and continuing professional
development. The School of Environmental Sciences follows
the University's mission by providing a multi-disciplinary
course covering the scientific and technological, as well
as the economic, sociological, philosophical and political
aspects of environmental issues. This is coupled with
training in practical, communication and information
technology (IT) skills; the aim is to prepare students for
both professional practice and further study or research.
-
The BSc course has a unit structure with clearly defined
but flexible pathways offering considerable breadth. The
first year (Stage 1) covers the theory and practice of the
natural and living environment, aspects of sociology and
the environment, and a range of courses in mathematics,
statistics and the physical sciences. The first-year
curriculum supports the aspirations for more open access
and aims to bring students from diverse academic
backgrounds to a common level. Provision is achieved
through a wide range of teaching and learning methods, and
considerable emphasis is placed on interdisciplinary
integration.
-
Core units run through later stages of the programme
alongside a wide choice of optional subjects, in line with
the mission of flexible provision and interdisciplinarity.
This flexible provision is continued in Stage 3 with the
major core unit Politics, Philosophy and Ethics of Science
and the Environment. This unit requires students to produce
a short documentary video film on a selected environmental
topic as a group project, involving film design, provision
of the script or documentary text, and an individual
student diary; assistance is provided by external
specialists. There is also a major final-year project which
offers a variety of research experiences across the
environmental spectrum. The involvement of a wide range of
external guest lecturers further enhances the programme.
-
Training is offered in IT, writing and communication
skills, and there are opportunities for students to have
European language tuition, though only around 10 per cent
are taking up this opportunity. The assessors consider that
there is scope for strengthening students' exposure to
languages and other aspects of the European dimension.
Between five and 10 students each year undertake exchanges
through an ERASMUS network with several European countries
and there are also European field trips.
-
The programme offers students relevance, flexibility and
choice, and the aims and objectives of the School and the
University are met. Students receive training across a wide
range of professional, vocational and transferable skills,
in preparation for employment or further study. There is
clear evidence of enthusiasm for innovation and the
adoption of new teaching methods, and the process of
curriculum development is working effectively.
Student Learning Experience
-
The School demonstrates a clear commitment to the provision
of high-quality teaching and learning. Considerable effort
is made by staff to support, encourage and guide all
students, particularly those with non-standard entry
qualifications. Remedial workshops are offered in all Stage
1 units, and other courses are offered in examination
technique, word-processing and statistical analysis.
-
All students are assigned to a personal tutor who provides
both academic counselling and pastoral support, and whose
role is clearly understood and valued by the students;
other academic support is provided by year (stage) tutors
and unit co-ordinators. Several members of the course team
have received formal training in pastoral skills. The
separation of the Deptford campus from the main site has
implications in terms of access to the University's
professional counsellors and other welfare services, but
there is no evidence that this presents any disadvantages
to students in the School, and a university counsellor
spends one day per week on the School site.
-
Similar considerations apply to the provision of careers
advice and assistance. A careers adviser with special
responsibility for environmental studies visits the
Deptford campus one day per fortnight, but students have
access to the University's careers service on the Woolwich
site.
-
The assessors observed a wide range of teaching and
learning activities, covering lecture, seminar, tutorial
and workshop sessions, as well as some fieldwork. Of the
classes observed, nearly 50 per cent were judged to be
excellent; the rest were all judged to be satisfactory,
with many good features and strengths. There were no
unsatisfactory classes. With few exceptions, the assessors
were impressed with the care paid to the preparation of
teaching materials, with the selection of the teaching
method most appropriate to the particular content of each
class, and with staff concern to engage and retain
students' attention. Objectives were generally clearly
stated at the start of every class, were located in the
context of the course as a whole, and key points were
summarised at the conclusion. Effective use of overhead
projectors was widespread.
-
The assessment methodology for all courses is clearly
stated and understood by staff and students. A wide range
of assessment methods is used, including oral and video
presentations, projects and laboratory and field reports,
as well as more traditional essays and examinations. The
assessments are at an appropriate level for all stages of
the programme and students expressed considerable
satisfaction with the level of feedback provided.
-
The School of Environmental Sciences is housed in a single
building containing three large lecture rooms seating
between 70 and 100 students, a medium-sized lecture room
seating 50 and five further rooms seating between 30 and
40. Teaching rooms are well equipped and there is good
technical support. Most staff are housed in single offices
adequate for tutorials. The accommodation is generally of a
good quality and is well maintained. There is a substantial
student common-room and a general canteen used by staff and
students.
-
The on-site library houses an adequate stock of most of the
books and journals required by the students, with multiple
copies of a considerable number of the major texts; books
ordered from the central library at Woolwich arrive within
one or two days. There are around 50 well-lit study spaces
in the library for nearly 550 FTE students on site. The
library opening hours are rather constrained, and there is
no weekend opening except close to examination periods;
students expressed some concern about the limited opening
hours. The library staff are supportive and effectively
work as part of the school team. The library provision is
the major area of concern in student evaluations,
particularly in the second and third years. Considerable
efforts have been made to develop the provision, but more
attention is needed in this area.
-
There is a dedicated computer laboratory housing nearly 40
PCs and an additional 23 PCs are available in another
computer suite; all are networked to the university system.
There are eight PCs in another laboratory on a local
network, and three new Sun workstations support advanced
geographical information systems work. All staff have
access to a PC and to laptop computers, but there is
limited e-mail access. The opening hours of the building
limit the availability of IT facilities; the assessors
recommend that the School should explore ways of extending
access.
-
There are three well-resourced laboratories, each with
bench spaces for 40, and a smaller overflow laboratory.
There is a substantial range of field equipment and
specialist equipment is housed in small rooms close to the
laboratories; there are three research laboratories. The
equipment is ample and is well maintained, and students
commented favourably on both the access to and the support
from academic and technical staff.
-
The documented evaluations and the assessors' discussions
with students provided clear evidence of a high degree of
satisfaction with the course and with the support provided
by the staff. The staff commitment is to be commended and
is undoubtedly a major factor in creating a high quality
experience.
-
There are 26 academic staff, 14 technicians and five
administrative staff in the School. Some 18 of the academic
staff are directly concerned with the units under
assessment, most holding a doctorate degree. The
multi-disciplinary approach to the teaching is reflected in
the staff profile, which covers a very wide range of
professional disciplines. The School also makes use of
practising environmental scientists as external lecturers.
The appointment of six new members of academic staff over
the past three years has expanded the range of expertise.
All new lecturing staff are required to undergo a formal
induction process, and those with less than three years'
teaching experience must complete part or all of the
Postgraduate Certificate in Education (HE) course. The
technical support staff are also well qualified.
-
Regular reviews of the staff base identify staff
development needs, as does the annual appraisal process;
this leads to members of staff undergoing training in new
subject areas and broadening their experience of
environmental matters. The team approach is also evident,
and research and consultancy activities are actively
encouraged. There is clear evidence of the interaction
between research and teaching. All the staff work well
together as a multi-disciplinary team, the School and the
University are seriously committed to the professional
development of staff at all levels, and morale and
motivation are high.
-
The Head of School chairs a general school management group
comprising course directors, elected representatives and
the safety officer; the elected representatives also carry
cross-school responsibilities. Academic management at unit,
course and subject levels is under the control of the
designated unit co-ordinators, course director, and subject
group leader, all of whom are ultimately responsible to the
Head of School for the maintenance of academic quality. The
Head of School is responsible to the Dean, the Faculty's
senior quality manager, and the Dean is accountable to the
Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Academic Affairs) for the
management and quality assurance procedures in the Faculty.
All members of the course teaching team, together with
elected student representatives, constitute the Course
Committee, which is responsible for all matters connected
with the degree scheme and which reports to the Faculty
Board. This Committee also functions as a staff-student
liaison committee.
-
Unit co-ordinators are responsible for reviewing their
units annually and make use of students' responses to
comprehensive unit evaluation questionnaires. Students also
respond to overall course evaluation questionnaires. This
information, together with external examiners' reports and
quantitative data on recruitment, progression, examination
results and first destinations of graduates, contributes to
the annual monitoring report, which is constructed by the
course director and the course committee. The report
includes an account of action taken in response to the
previous report and an action plan for the coming year.
Annual reports progress through the University's quality
monitoring mechanisms which appear to work well, and there
is good evidence that these reviews contribute to the
development of quality programmes. There is also
considerable informal student input to which staff are
responsive. Procedures for the validation of new programmes
and periodic review of courses are sound. Overall, there is
a rigorous approach to quality assurance and a
responsiveness to the views of students, external examiners
and other external authorities. The clear
cross-institutional commitment to providing high-quality
education matches the University's mission statement.
Student Achievement
-
The assessors are satisfied that the School's aim to train
students in a range of subject-specific and general skills
is achieved. The course team stressed the importance
attached to instilling an awareness of the social
construction of scientific knowledge, and there is evidence
that a critical approach to science is not confined to the
social scientists, but is also shared by team members with
formal science qualifications. The final-year core unit
Politics, Philosophy and Ethics of Science and Environment
constitutes a major component of the whole course. This is
a demanding unit, but one which challenges the more able
students. Reviewing examination scripts for this unit, the
assessors encountered some excellent answers to questions
on complex concepts, demonstrating that success in the
course demands both depth and breadth of knowledge.
-
The University stresses its commitment to flexible access
and seeks to recruit students with diverse academic
backgrounds. The standard entry requirement to the BSc
programme for candidates with GCE A-Level passes is 10
points, though students are admitted with lower scores and
many are recruited through `clearing'. A high proportion of
students enter with alternative qualifications, for example
BTEC, or from access courses, or through foundation (Stage
0) or bridging courses. Of the students recruited over the
period 1992 to 1994, 54 per cent held qualifications other
than two or more GCE A-Levels, 56 per cent were female, 31
per cent were mature students and 15 per cent were of
ethnic minority origin. This last figure reflects local
demography rather than the application of a positive
discrimination policy. The range of pre-entry provision,
coupled with admissions tutors' assessment of applications,
has permitted expansion of the intake, primarily by mature
students, without compromising the principle of recruiting
only those believed to be capable of completing the course.
There is provision for disabled students.
-
Progression statistics suggest that the increased intake
has not resulted in a corresponding increase in wastage at
the end of Stage 1. The percentage deferred or failed has
not risen in 1993-94 and the increase in the proportion (10
per cent) choosing to withdraw, transfer or interrupt their
studies is probably due to financial difficulties rather
than any dissatisfaction with the course. The assessors
consider that the progression rates are consistent with the
University's commitment to flexible entry.
-
Discussions with employers also revealed a high degree of
satisfaction with the quality of the graduates, and the
Institution of Environmental Sciences has commended the
quality of the course. Former students were likewise very
supportive and felt that the course had equipped them well
for their chosen careers or further study. Together, the
employers and former students confirmed that the School is
meeting its aim of achieving vocational relevance. The
assessors felt that the School makes insufficient use of
the breadth of experience of former students, given their
clear gratitude and loyalty. The employment statistics
reflect the difficult employment conditions of recent years
and the overall results are similar to those of other
institutions offering environmental science/studies
programmes. The course team has made good use of Enterprise
in Higher Education funding to develop links with employers
to support the teaching programme and to develop
opportunities for students.
-
For those entrants with non-standard qualifications, and
those who have spent many years outside formal education,
the award of an honours degree must be accepted as an
indicator of real personal achievement. Similarly, for
those students entering with modest achievement at GCE
A-Level, the award of an honours degree represents a
considerable achievement requiring the development of
academic skills and a commitment to learning. The key issue
for the assessors was whether the overall results, for
example 26 First and Upper Second class degrees in a total
of 38 awarded in 1992-93, can be justified. On the basis of
the external examiners' comments and scrutiny of a range of
examination scripts, the assessors are confident that the
degree classes awarded are fully justified. Overall, the
external examiners appear to be very satisfied with the
level of work attained by the students and are supportive
of the programme.
-
The impressive student achievement reflects the high
quality of the education provided, which is ideally matched
to the level and diversity of the student intake. The
School is encouraged to continue to focus on the range of
students which it currently recruits.
Conclusions and Recommendations
-
The University of Greenwich claims to provide an excellent
education in environmental studies. The assessors come to
the overall conclusion, based on the assessment visit and
an analysis of the self-assessment, together with the
statistical indicators, that the quality of education in
environmental studies at the University of Greenwich is
excellent.
-
The positive features identified by the assessors include
the following:
-
Provision of a multi-disciplinary programme of
well-designed course units.
-
Commendable breadth and flexibility in the study
programme, strong practical and fieldwork components,
and effective training in transferable skills.
-
A policy of open access, with clear evidence of
impressive student achievement, regardless of entry
route and initial qualifications.
-
First-class academic and pastoral support.
-
High-quality teaching, designed and delivered in
response to student learning needs by a dedicated and
enthusiastic team of well-qualified staff. Almost 50
per cent of sessions observed were graded excellent.
-
Effective staff induction, training and appraisal.
-
The positive impact of staff research and consultancy
on teaching and course development.
-
Commendable university policy on resourcing the School.
-
Effective and well-established formal mechanisms for
quality assurance, supplemented by highly responsive
use of informal feedback from students.
-
Good leadership, exemplary relationships between all
staff, and between staff and students, which have
created an excellent study and work environment.
-
The University of Greenwich can build upon these positive
qualities by considering the following recommendations:
-
The School should explore ways of developing further
its European dimension.
-
It is recommended that the School might advantageously
make better use of the wealth and diversity of
experience of its former graduates.
-
Library provision is considered by students to be the
least satisfactory aspect of their experience. Although
the School and the University have made efforts to
improve the situation, further action is required.
-
Out-of-hours access to the library and to IT facilities
may well be a constraint on the student learning
experience. Ways of extending access should be
explored.
Home
Top