We use cookies on this website. If you continue to use the website, we will use cookies to maximise your experience and help us to improve.

To find out more about cookies, how we use them and how to remove them, see our privacy and cookies statement.
safeguarding standards and improving the quality of UK higher education
Data and reports on quality and standards at Christ the Redeemer College, from the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA).
Christ the Redeemer College, reports, The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, QAA,

Christ the Redeemer College


Latest review

Higher Education Review (Alternative Providers): Christ the Redeemer College, February 2016
Judgements about standards and quality

The maintenance of the academic standards of awards offered on behalf of degree-awarding bodies and/or other awarding organisations meets UK expectations.

The quality of student learning opportunities meets UK expectations.

The quality of the information about learning opportunities meets UK expectations.

The enhancement of student learning opportunities meets UK expectations.

Report published June 2016
Important note

Since the report on Christ the Redeemer College was published, QAA conducted a partial re-review of the area which originally received a negative judgement - the enhancement of student learning opportunities. The re-review team was satisfied that for this judgement area the original recommendations had been acted upon in a serious and effective way. As a result, in February 2017 the judgement was amended from 'requires improvement to meet UK expectations' to 'meets UK expectations'.

​​​In response to the findings highlighted in this review report, the provider has published an action plan (opens in a new window).

Previous review report


Higher Education Review (Alternative Providers) involves a full QAA review every four years, and an annual return and short monitoring visits between reviews.

We train staff and students from other providers to carry out the review and monitoring visits. They also make judgements on the provider's management of quality and standards, its commitment to the process of improving its systems, and the reliability of the information produced about its provision.

We are independent of government, universities and colleges and our findings and judgements are published here.

Status:  Not publicly funded, without degree awarding powers