We use cookies on this website. If you continue to use the website, we will use cookies to maximise your experience and help us to improve.

To find out more about cookies, how we use them and how to remove them, see our privacy and cookies statement.
safeguarding standards and improving the quality of UK higher education
ata and reports on quality and standards at St Patrick's International College, from the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA).
St Patrick's International College, reports, The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, QAA,

St Patrick's International College


Latest review

Higher Education Review (Alternative Providers): St Patrick's International College Ltd, November 2015
Judgements about standards and quality

The maintenance of the academic standards of awards offered on behalf of degree-awarding bodies and/or other awarding organisations meets UK expectations.

The quality of student learning opportunities meets UK expectations.

The quality of the information about learning opportunities meets UK expectations.

The enhancement of student learning opportunities meets UK expectations

Report published March 2016
Important note

Since the report on St Patrick's International College was published, QAA conducted a partial re-review of the two areas which originally received negative judgements - the quality of student learning opportunities and the enhancement of student learning opportunities. The re-review team was satisfied that for each of these judgement areas the original recommendations had been acted upon in a serious and effective way. As a result, in October 2016 the judgements were amended from 'requires improvement to meet UK expectations' to 'meets UK expectations'.

Previous review report


Higher Education Review (Alternative Providers) involve a full QAA review every four years, and an annual return and short monitoring visits between reviews.

We train staff and students from other providers to carry out the review and monitoring visits. They also make judgements on the provider's management of quality and standards, its commitment to the process of improving its systems, and the reliability of the information produced about its provision.

We are independent of government, universities and colleges and our findings and judgements are published here.

Status:  QAA subscriber, not publicly funded, without degree awarding powers