We use cookies on this website. If you continue to use the website, we will use cookies to maximise your experience and help us to improve.

To find out more about cookies, how we use them and how to remove them, see our privacy and cookies statement.
safeguarding standards and improving the quality of UK higher education
QAA Review Graphic Thumbnail
Data and reports on quality and standards at The Metanoia Institute, from the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA).
The Metanoia Institute; reports; The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education; QAA;

The Metanoia Institute


Latest review

Higher Education Review (Alternative Providers): The Metanoia Institute, December 2017
Judgements about standards and quality

The maintenance of the academic standards of awards offered on behalf of degree-awarding bodies and/or other awarding organisations meets UK expectations

The quality of student learning opportunities at the provider meets UK expectations

The quality of the information about learning opportunities meets UK expectations

The enhancement of student learning opportunities at the provider meets UK expectations

Report published March 2018
Important note

​In response to the findings highlighted in the Higher Education Review report, the provider published an action plan.

Previous review report

Higher Education Review (Alternative Providers) involves a full QAA review every four years, and an annual return and short monitoring visits between reviews.

We train staff and students from other providers to carry out the review and monitoring visits. They also make judgements on the provider's management of quality and standards, its commitment to the process of improving its systems, and the reliability of the information produced about its provision.

We are independent of government, universities and colleges and our findings and judgements are published here.

Status:  Not publicly funded, without degree awarding powers