We use cookies on this website. If you continue to use the website, we will use cookies to maximise your experience and help us to improve.

To find out more about cookies, how we use them and how to remove them, see our privacy and cookies statement.
safeguarding standards and improving the quality of UK higher education
Data and reports on quality and standards at Hopwood Hall College, from the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA).
Hopwood Hall College, reports, The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, QAA,

Hopwood Hall College


Latest review

Higher Education Review: Hopwood Hall College, May 2014
Judgements about standards and quality

The maintenance of the threshold academic standards of awards offered on behalf of degree-awarding bodies and/or other awarding organisations meets UK expectations

The quality of student learning opportunities at the provider meets UK expectations

The quality of the information produced by the provider about its provision meets UK expectations

The enhancement of student learning opportunities at the provider meets UK expectations

Report published September 2014
Important note

​In response to the findings highlighted in this review report, the provider has published an action plan (opens in new window).

Since the report on Hopwood Hall College was published, the review team can now confirm that the College, working in partnership with the student body, has satisfactorily addressed the review team's recommendations relating to the negative judgement on the enhancement of student learning opportunities through the action-planning process. In October 2016 the judgement was amended from 'does not meet UK expectations' to 'meets UK expectations'.

Previous review report


We visit universities and colleges once every six years to conduct a Higher Education Review of the standards and quality of the education they provide.

We train staff and students from other providers to carry out the review of the university or college and to make judgements on its management of quality and standards, its commitment to the process of improving its systems, and the reliability of the information produced about its provision.

We are independent of government, universities and colleges and our findings and judgements are published here.

Status:  QAA subscriber, publicly funded, without degree awarding powers