We use cookies on this website. If you continue to use the website, we will use cookies to maximise your experience and help us to improve.

To find out more about cookies, how we use them and how to remove them, see our privacy and cookies statement.
safeguarding standards and improving the quality of UK higher education
QAA Quality Mark thumbnail
Data and reports on quality and standards at City College Coventry, from the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA).
City College Coventry, reports, The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education, QAA,

City College Coventry

Latest review

Higher Education Review: City College Coventry, October 2014
Judgements about standards and quality

The maintenance of the academic standards of awards offered on behalf of degree-awarding bodies and/or other awarding organisations meets UK expectations.

The quality of student learning opportunities meets UK expectations.

The quality of the information about learning opportunities meets UK expectations.

The enhancement of student learning opportunities meets UK expectations

Report published March 2015
Important note

​In response to the findings highlighted in this review report, the provider has published an action plan (opens in a new window).

Since the report on City College Coventry was published, the review team can now confirm that the College, working in partnership with the student body, has satisfactorily addressed the review team's initial recommendations relating to the originally negative judgements on the quality of student learning opportunities and the quality of information about learning opportunities, through the action planning process. In April 2016 the judgements were amended from 'requires improvement to meet UK expectations' to 'meets UK expectations'.


Previous review report


Note

We visit universities and colleges once every six years to conduct a Higher Education Review of the standards and quality of the education they provide.

We train staff and students from other providers to carry out the review of the university or college and to make judgements on its management of quality and standards, its commitment to the process of improving its systems, and the reliability of the information produced about its provision.

We are independent of government, universities and colleges and our findings and judgements are published here.

Status:  QAA subscriber, publicly funded, without degree awarding powers