Skip to main navigation Skip to content
safeguarding standards and improving the quality of UK higher education
 
 

Institution reports

Related links
Title:
Audit of collaborative provision: Middlesex University, April 2011 
Institution:
Middlesex University
Attachments:
Date of review Publication date Type of review Judgements about quality and standards Reference
Apr-2011 16 Sep 2011 Audit of Collaborative Provision: England and Northern Ireland Confidence can reasonably be placed in the soundness of the institution's present and likely future management of the academic standards of its awards. -
What does this mean?

Confidence can reasonably be placed in the soundness of the institution's present and likely future management of the quality of the learning opportunities available to students. -
What does this mean?

ISBN 978 1 84979 382 7
Features of good practice Recommendations for action
  • the Learning and Quality Enhancement Handbook as a comprehensive resource for partners and schools in developing, maintaining and enhancing collaborative provision
  • the care given to the validation of distance education programmes, which contributes significantly to the assurance of quality in such programmes
  • the pivotal role of the link tutors and the structures for their support and development in ensuring the effectiveness of collaborative partnerships
  • the Professional Doctorate Development Group and its role in promoting consistency of practice and in enhancing quality.

It would be desirable for the University to:

  • ensure the full completion of each monitoring report through the inclusion of comprehensive data tables, as specified in the annual and quality monitoring report template
  • take steps to ensure that the University's policies and procedures are followed for the sharing of external examiner reports, as a matter of course, with student representatives at all boards of studies
  • establish a means of extracting and disseminating, more systematically, learning points from the University annual overviews of programme monitoring and from professional, statutory and regulatory body accreditations
  • make explicit the degree of flexibility in implementation available to programme teams in collaborative partners with respect to embedding personal development planning in the curriculum
  • ensure that any future strategies and policies for staff development are explicit regarding the needs of partner institutions.